The Role of Innovative Work Behavior in Generation Z’s Interest in Entrepreneurship: The Mediating Effect of Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy on MSME Workers in Makassar City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65792/jombinov.v2i3.56Keywords:
Innovative Work Behavior,, Entrepreneurial Self-Confidence,, Entrepreneurial Intention,, Generation-Z,, Entrepreneurship,, Makasar CityAbstract
This study examines how innovative work behavior affects entrepreneurial intention among Generation Z employees at micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Makassar. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy serves as the mediating variable. The study used a quantitative, explanatory, cross-sectional design. Purposive sampling yielded 200 Gen Z MSME employees as respondents. PLS-SEM in SmartPLS 4.1 handled the analysis, and mediation was tested through Zhao, Lynch, and Chen's (2010) procedure. Innovative work behavior significantly affects both entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention. Self-efficacy, in turn, significantly affects intention. Self-efficacy partially and complementarily mediates the relationship between innovative work behavior and intention, accounting for 58% of the total effect. This study links three theories, self-efficacy theory, Social Cognitive Career Theory, and the Theory of Planned Behavior, into one explanatory chain. It clarifies the tension between mastery-experience and job-embeddedness pathways. It also extends innovative work behavior research into individual entrepreneurial pathways, a direction largely unexplored in Eastern Indonesian MSME settings. MSME owners should formalize channels for realizing employees' ideas. Policymakers should design retention programs that support innovative young talent. Entrepreneurship educators should embed practical, innovation-focused work experience into their curricula. Five factors limit generalizability: the cross-sectional design, single-source self-report data, purposive sampling, the single-mediator model, and the single-city context. Job embeddedness was interpreted conceptually rather than tested empirically. Future research should adopt a longitudinal, multi-city design to address these gaps.
Downloads
References
Alarifi, G., & Adam, N. A. (2023). The role of participatory leadership and employee innovative behavior on SMEs' endurance. Sustainability, 15(3), 2740. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032740
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.
Hossain, M. I., Tabash, M. I., Siow, M. L., Ong, T. S., & Anagreh, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial intentions of Gen Z university students and entrepreneurial constraints in Bangladesh. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00279-y
Lopes, J. M., Gomes, S., & Trancoso, T. (2024). From risk to reward: Understanding the influence of Generation Z and personality factors on sustainable entrepreneurial behaviour. FIIB Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145241271467
BPS Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. (2025). Keadaan ketenagakerjaan Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan November 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan.
Dinas Koperasi dan UMKM Kota Makassar. (2024). Data jumlah pelaku usaha mikro, kecil, dan menengah Kota Makassar 2024. Pemerintah Kota Makassar.
Flocco, N., Canterino, F., & Cagliano, R. (2022). To control or not to control: How to organize employee-driven innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(3), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12500
Gulia, D., Arora, S., & Rahul, K. (2025). Mapping the scientific shreds on barriers to SMEs' innovation. SEDME (Small Enterprises Development, Management & Extension Journal), 52(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/09708464241291290
Yonas F. Riwu., Klaasvakumok Kamuri., Sonia V. Nawi. 2026. The Mediating Role of Innovation and Artificial Intelligence on SMEs Performance. Journal of Management and Business Innovation. (2) 1, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.65792/jombinov.v2i01.36.
Li, M., Li, J., & Chen, X. (2022). Employees' entrepreneurial dreams and turnover intention to start-up: The moderating role of job embeddedness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159360
Maden Eyiusta, C., & Esen, A. (2025). Fostering organizational innovation in SMEs through employee-driven innovation: The role of IB-HRM practices and empowering leadership. European Management Journal, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2025.04.006
Nguyen, M. T., & Petchsawang, P. (2024). Encouraging employees' innovative behavior via the mediating effect of work engagement and the moderating effect of their proactive personality: the case of Generation Z in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2301162. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2301162
Saura, J. R., Palacios-Marqués, D., Correia, M. B., & Barbosa, B. (2023). Editorial: Innovative behavior in entrepreneurship: Analyzing new perspectives and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1123236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1123236
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x
McGee, J. E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S. L., & Sequeira, J. M. (2009). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00304.x
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Prihatsanti, U. (2018). The relationship between entrepreneurial self-efficacy, entrepreneurial curiosity and innovative behavior on entrepreneur students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 133, 155–158. https://doi.org/10.2991/acpch-17.2018.31
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ikshan Bakri, Mulyati, Sulaiman Idris (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
